So what's in a handicap? And what, in cold type, does it say about you or your opinion as a golfer?
Because you may have a 28 handicap - the maximum recognised officially for men at a golf club (or 36 for women) - does it mean your observations carry less weight than a single figure golfer in either category?
There has been an interesting return to a
Golfmagic forum thread this week which originated quite a while ago, where one inference appears that high numbers after your name or nickname might condemn you as someone inappropriate to respond to an opinion or remark from someone with a lower or, perhaps, superior handicap.
I could feel the hairs bristling on the back of my neck as I interpreted the unspoken space between its lines and its dark undertones.
Is this saying: 'with a handicap that high, what do you know?' or 'without a handicap after your name, you obviously have something to hide so how can you possibly be taken seriously?'
Surely this isn't the case.
For example I know many of my contemporaries who achieved low (even scratch)handicaps but age, disability or merely accessibility to golf - the grandchildren took over as their No.1 interest - has prevented them from hanging on either to their original powers or their golf status.
Does that make Fred Nerk (25.4 handicap) any less able to use his experience and knowledge to respond clearly and sensibly to a forum posting requesting (nay, demanding) the secret of anti-slice? Or the best way to tackle a downhill lie in a bunker?